The website eu-mdr.eu is intended to help companies from different sectors and with different products to reach the safe haven of MDR conformity in an efficient way.
Type of device: Class 1 instruments - I, Im, Ir ,Irm
Challenge: devices were commercialized without proper documentation. Only under own declaration of conformity. Manufacturer needs to keep device on the market but has not quality system in place and no suitable technical documentation
Type of device: Class IIB Implants
Challenge: The company was previously only selling products and wants now to resell under own brand implant from other manufacturer and also develop new ones
This website contains a list of free resources and a central repository for MDR related topics and guidance.
Moreover a free Gap Analysis document tool is also available for download.
Here below the KEY POINTS for a Smooth Transition which are also discussed in the Gap Analysis tool:
Planning
Manufactures should start an evaluation plan of all their current CE-marked devices in relation to the new MDR guidelines. For some devices, this also means taking into account changes in the classification.
We can support in create a proper Gap Analysis and your custom MDR Transition plan.
The MDR Transition Plan will give you the full picture and overview of your current situation and gaps that needs to be filled to stay compliant.
This will help your company define a proper structured plan, set priority, initiate critical activities on time and smoothly manage the transition.
Analyze and Asses | Sub-Task | Plan and Execute | Review and Finalize |
We will start with a gap assessment and evaluation of your current situation considering the type of product and define the required step to achieve compliance to MDR 2017/745. | The work package will be spitted in different sub task | A plan will be defined considering priorities and risk and executed | Each sub task will be reviewed until finalization |
Changes will be made to the way in which medical devices will be classified, with increasingly specific requirements based on the risk to which the patient is exposed. It follows a more restrictive classification and therefore an increase in class for many devices (for example, some devices that come into contact with the spinal cord will pass from class II to class III).
The reclassification of the devices will require costly certification processes for new products and a re-certification of products already on the market. Having said this, it should not be taken for granted that for a device that has not been reclassified the steps to make sure it remains compliant will be quick or simple.
Understanding what has changed between directives 93/42 / CEE medical devices and 90/385 / EEC active implantable medical devices and the new MDR is essential as it is highly probable that a revision of Annex I will be required for most devices, General safety and performance requirements, which will identify new conditions to be applied for each device.
Apply to all medical devices placed on the market except custom-made devices.
Use:
The European Commission shall designate by means of implementing acts UDI issuing entities provided that they satisfy certain criteria.
Until the Commission has designated UDI issuing entities, GS1, HIBCC, ICCBBA shall be considered as designated issuing entities.
Clinical data, technical documentation and labeling must be updated. Furthermore, it will be necessary to review the processes including general safety and performance data, quality assurance, clinical trials, risk management, general compliance, traceability and post-market clinical follow-up that will require careful review, planning and updating for re-implementation in accordance with the new requirements.
With the new MDR, post-market surveillance is emphasized. This includes proactive performance monitoring of the recertification device, annual safety updates for high-risk class devices and prompt reporting of incidents.
Although the increase in the frequency of safety and performance reports may require significant additional resources for companies, these requirements can best identify potential problems at the beginning of the production cycle. Facing them can protect patients and reduce the producer's liability.
By the end of the transition process, any CE marked device must be fully compliant with the MDR. The UK Pharmaceutical Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has estimated that over half a million devices currently CE marked under Directives 93/42 / EEC and 90/385 / EEC will have to undergo the transition process and meet the new MDR.
Although many MDR requirements are similar to the current requirements in the field of MDD (Medical Device Directive) and AIMDD (Active Implantable Medical Devices Directive), the MDR is much more prescriptive and many devices will not have been deemed fully compliant with the new requirements.
As part of the MDR, the emphasis is on more in-depth reviews by notified bodies to confirm that manufacturers are fully compliant and that devices are fully supported by adequate data and technical documentation.